Today Blockchain has evolved rapidly, and with these technological changes, creating a project is no longer just about having a groundbreaking idea; it’s about strategic planning, execution, and ongoing enhancement. Blockchain has become similar to crafting an art piece with new technologies, platforms, and practices emerging rapidly. So, whether you’re starting fresh or are already a pro knowing what steps to follow can make all the difference.
This article walks you through key practices that will help you build a blockchain project that’s not only innovative but also secure, scalable, and built for the long run.
Imagine you are building a castle of blocks with your friends. Now everybody just randomly starts adding pieces without planning and strategizing. What do you think would happen? Pretty soon, the castle might look messy or even fall apart! The same thing can happen in blockchain development, only here you have much more to lose.
So, following best practices isn’t just about being “extra careful”; it’s about creating something strong, safe, and future-proof, so users and developers can count on it long-term. In the world of blockchain, a good foundation matters more than anything!
Let's get started and have a look at the Best practices to follow in Blockchain development.
Testing is the most important step of the Blockchain development life cycle. It ensures that applications function as expected and finds out issues and bugs if any. Since blockchain is decentralized it can lead a widespread errors that include financial loss and reputational damage. Hence testing ensures the security, functionality, and performance of your applications. A well-tested application not only protects users but also enhances trust in the technology.
Unit tests catch the bugs at an early stage and are a safety net, making it easier and less costly to fix them. Due to unit testing, if there are any and we resolve it, the new code doesn't break the existing functionality.
Here’s an example of a Solidity Unit Test with Hardhat and Chai
// Sample Solidity Smart Contract // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; contract Token { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; constructor() { balances[msg.sender] = 1000; // Initial balance for the contract deployer } function transfer(address recipient, uint256 amount) public returns (bool) { require(balances[msg.sender] >= amount, "Insufficient balance"); balances[msg.sender] -= amount; balances[recipient] += amount; return true; } } |
Integration testing helps to identify and resolve issues arising from the interactions between different microservices in your application and helps in more cohesive functioning.
Example Code Snippet for Integration Testing:
// Integration test for contract interaction const { expect } = require("chai"); describe("Integration test between Token and Marketplace contracts", function () { it("should allow token transfer for marketplace purchases", async function () { const [owner, buyer] = await ethers.getSigners(); const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("Token"); const Marketplace = await ethers.getContractFactory("Marketplace"); const token = await Token.deploy(); const marketplace = await Marketplace.deploy(token.address); await token.deployed(); await marketplace.deployed(); // Transfer tokens to the buyer for marketplace use await token.transfer(buyer.address, 500); expect(await token.balances(buyer.address)).to.equal(500); // Buyer approves tokens for marketplace contract await token.connect(buyer).approve(marketplace.address, 200); const purchaseTx = await marketplace.connect(buyer).buyItem(1, 200); await purchaseTx.wait(); // Check balances post-purchase expect(await token.balances(buyer.address)).to.equal(300); expect(await token.balances(marketplace.address)).to.equal(200); }); }); |
Functional testing is important because it assures that the application performs as intended in real-world scenarios.
// Functional test to validate smart contract requirements const { expect } = require("chai"); describe("Token contract - Functional Testing", function () { it("should not allow transfer when balance is insufficient", async function () { const [owner, addr1] = await ethers.getSigners(); const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("Token"); const token = await Token.deploy(); await token.deployed(); // Attempting a transfer larger than balance await expect(token.connect(addr1).transfer(owner.address, 50)) .to.be.revertedWith("Insufficient balance"); }); }); |
This testing ensures that the application can handle all real-world stress efficiently and how good and reliable the application is for the users. This is crucial for maintaining a good user experience and operational integrity, especially as the number of users grows. The metric used for testing is the number of transactions the blockchain can process per second (TPS).
Performance Testing is of three types:
// Script for load testing using Web3.js and a test framework const Web3 = require('web3'); const web3 = new Web3(new Web3.providers.HttpProvider('http://localhost:8545')); async function performLoadTest(contractInstance, iterations, account) { for (let i = 0; i < iterations; i++) { try { await contractInstance.methods.transfer('0xRecipientAddress', 1).send({ from: account }); console.log(`Transaction ${i + 1} completed`); } catch (error) { console.error(`Transaction ${i + 1} failed:`, error); } } } // Sample call (async () => { const contract = new web3.eth.Contract(abi, contractAddress); const accounts = await web3.eth.getAccounts(); await performLoadTest(contract, 1000, accounts[0]); // Run 1000 transactions })(); |
// Sample vulnerable Solidity contract function withdraw(uint amount) public { require(balance[msg.sender] >= amount); (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); // Vulnerable line require(success); balance[msg.sender] -= amount; } // Reentrancy attack simulation using JavaScript/Hardhat const { ethers } = require("hardhat"); describe("Reentrancy attack simulation", function () { it("should exploit reentrancy vulnerability", async function () { const [attacker, victim] = await ethers.getSigners(); const VulnerableContract = await ethers.getContractFactory("VulnerableContract"); const AttackerContract = await ethers.getContractFactory("AttackerContract"); const vulnerable = await VulnerableContract.deploy(); await vulnerable.deployed(); const attackerInstance = await AttackerContract.deploy(vulnerable.address); await attackerInstance.deployed(); // Attack scenario await attackerInstance.connect(attacker).attack({ value: ethers.utils.parseEther("1") }); expect(await ethers.provider.getBalance(vulnerable.address)).to.equal(0); // Check drained balance }); }); |
You must have a good idea about different types of testing and how to incorporate them at different stages. Now, let's look at the tools and libraries that come in handy while conducting these tests.
Also, read our article on testing and deploying smart contracts
Auditing plays an important role in blockchain as it ensures that the application is secure and functions as intended.. Smart contracts often manage substantial amounts of assets, and even a minor coding flaw can lead to severe financial loss, security breaches, and loss of trust among users.To prevent the hassles audits must be conducted.This preventive step is a sviour for developers and reassures users that their assets and interactions are safe.
The typical auditing takes place in stages:
// Example: Check function visibility to avoid unintentional exposure function internalLogic() internal { // Code logic } |
uint8 a = 255; a += 1; // This would overflow without proper checks |
// Example of a reentrancy vulnerability function withdraw(uint256 _amount) public { require(balances[msg.sender] >= _amount, "Insufficient balance"); (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: _amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); balances[msg.sender] -= _amount; // Reduces balance after the transfer (reentrancy risk) } |
// Example test in JavaScript for Hardhat describe("Audit test for smart contract", function () { it("Should prevent non-owners from calling restricted functions", async function () { await expect(contract.connect(nonOwner).restrictedFunction()).to.be.revertedWith("Only the owner can call this function"); }); }); |
To conduct a thorough audit you needs tools as follows:
Gas optimization plays a crucial role in keeping transaction costs low and ensuring that smart contracts operate smoothly. To optimize effectively, it’s important to understand how gas works. Gas fees reflect the computational power needed to execute operations on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Each operation has its own gas cost, and contracts with high gas consumption can become too expensive to use, especially as network congestion increases.
One common optimization technique is to use fixed-size arrays rather than dynamic ones, as they require less gas. Additionally, when dealing with variables that don’t need to persist beyond a function’s execution, using memory instead of storage is beneficial. This is because reading from and writing to storage is far more costly than using memory. For example, when iterating over data within a loop, using memory variables can significantly improve performance and reduce gas costs.
function processData(uint256[] memory data) public pure returns (uint256) { uint256 sum = 0; for (uint i = 0; i < data.length; i++) { sum += data[i]; } return sum; // Efficient use of memory } |
Upgrading smart contracts can be tricky because blockchain is inherently immutable. However, there are strategies to work around this limitation, with proxy contracts being one of the most effective solutions. A proxy contract acts as a go-between, directing function calls to the main contract that holds the core logic. When an update or improvement is needed, developers only replace the contract containing the logic, while the proxy and storage remain intact. This approach ensures that all existing data stays safe and consistent, even as the underlying code is improved or fixed.
contract Proxy { address implementation; function upgrade(address _newImplementation) external { implementation = _newImplementation; } fallback() external payable { (bool success, ) = implementation.delegatecall(msg.data); require(success, "Delegate call failed"); } } |
Upgrading smart contracts on a blockchain is no small task because the data is designed to be permanent and unchangeable. To work around this, developers often use proxy contracts. A proxy acts like a middleman, routing calls to the main contract where the logic lives. If updates or fixes are needed, only the logic contract gets replaced while the proxy and storage parts stay the same. This approach keeps existing data safe and intact while allowing the code to evolve over time.
Forks can be a major challenge, as they involve changes to a blockchain’s underlying rules or even the creation of a new chain altogether. To handle forks effectively, developers need a proactive approach that keeps their smart contracts running smoothly. This often means testing how contracts behave in fork scenarios and preparing contingency plans in case changes need to be made.
Flexibility is critical. Developers should consider adding features that let them pause functions or migrate the contract if necessary. Keeping users informed and providing clear documentation is just as important. It ensures trust and transparency, which can make navigating a fork much easier for everyone involved.
In blockchain development, following best practices is key to building secure, efficient, and easy-to-use applications. Writing clean and maintainable code makes it easier to manage and scale your project. Focus on security by using trusted libraries and thoroughly testing your code to avoid vulnerabilities. Using proxy contracts for upgrades and being ready for forks help your project stay flexible. Keep communication open with users to build trust and ensure your app remains reliable. By sticking to these practices, you can create solid blockchain applications that stand the test of time.Keep Learning and Happy Coding!!