@CMEGroup has filed a federal lawsuit against the @CFTC and Chairman Michael Selig, escalating a legal battle over the classification of cryptocurrency perpetual futures in the United States.
@CMEGroup has filed a federal lawsuit against the @CFTC and Chairman Michael Selig, escalating a legal battle over the classification of cryptocurrency perpetual futures in the United States. Bloomberg reported the suit was filed Thursday in federal court in Washington.
The dispute stems from the CFTC's decision in late May to allow prediction market platform Kalshi to list $BTC perpetual futures contracts in the US. The CFTC approved Kalshi to begin offering Bitcoin perpetual futures, contracts that have no expiration date but allow traders to speculate on price without owning the underlying asset. The approval was the first time the asset class, already popular overseas, was permitted in the US, and Kalshi has since expanded its perps offerings to other cryptocurrencies.
CME's legal argument centres on how those contracts should be classified under existing law. The Dodd-Frank Act draws a distinction between futures, which involve settlement at a defined expiration date, and swaps, which involve two parties continuously exchanging payments based on an underlying reference rate. Perpetual futures have no expiration date and instead use a funding-rate mechanism to keep the contract price anchored to spot. CME CEO Terrence Duffy argues that structure makes perps swaps, not futures.
Duffy argued that these products are actually swaps under the Dodd-Frank Act, meaning platforms like Kalshi would need to register as swap dealers to offer them. That classification would impose significantly heavier capital requirements and registration obligations on any platform listing the contracts.
Duffy said he had spent eight months preparing the challenge with CME's board and made clear the company viewed the approval process itself as flawed, arguing the CFTC had cleared a novel instrument faster than typical review procedures would allow.
In an emailed statement, a CFTC spokesperson said the CME had "decided to undertake lawfare against the agency and the Trump Administration's pro-innovation agenda," adding that "incumbents fear the future" and that the agency looked forward to "dismissing this frivolous lawsuit."
CFTC Chair Michael Selig has defended the approval as a way to bring a major segment of crypto derivatives activity under domestic regulation.Shortly after Kalshi's launch, Coinbase also announced plans to offer similar products.Kalshi generated more than $5.5 billion in perpetual futures trading volume within the first two weeks of launch.
Derivatives lawyers have noted that the case could function as a test of the entire CFTC product-approval framework for crypto, putting the futures-swap boundary under federal court scrutiny it has never faced in the context of crypto. The outcome could also shape how Congress applies legislation currently moving through the Senate that would formally define CFTC authority over digital commodity derivatives.
Sources:Bloomberg: CME Sues CFTC Over Approval of Cryptocurrency Perpetual Futures ContractsCNBC: CME CEO Terrence Duffy says the exchange operator will sue CFTC over perpetual futuresCoinDesk: CME chief executive says company plans to sue CFTC after perpetual futures approval
