A debate about the XRP Ledger’s fee structure recently pulled one of its original architects into the conversation. David Schwartz, Chief Technology Officer at Ripple and a key figure in buil
A debate about the XRP Ledger’s fee structure recently pulled one of its original architects into the conversation.
David Schwartz, Chief Technology Officer at Ripple and a key figure in building the XRP Ledger, offered a concise explanation of how XRP derives its value. His response has since circulated widely among the XRP community.
The exchange began when an X user challenged the logic behind XRPL’s fee-burning mechanism. That user argued the architects designed XRP as a deflationary currency and cited the long-term effects of fee burns on the network.
Another user, Saul, pushed back on that interpretation. Saul noted the fee structure exists primarily for spam prevention, not price appreciation. “You need fees for spam prevention, but they can’t go to validators,” he wrote, “so instead they burn the fees. But the key is that they keep them LOW.”
Schwartz then added his own take. In three sentences, he laid out how XRPL creates conditions for XRP to accumulate value. “Low fees and reliable operation make XRPL a great place to move and hold value,” he wrote. “That drives value flow to XRPL. XRP captures some of that value because of its unique advantages over other assets on XRPL.”
The statement connects infrastructure quality directly to asset value. Low fees and consistent performance attract users and capital to the ledger. Activity on the ledger generates value flow. XRP, by virtue of its position and unique properties within that ecosystem, captures a portion of that flow.
Schwartz’s comment aligns closely with Saul’s point about user experience. Keeping fees low is a deliberate design priority. Higher fees would accelerate the deflationary burn rate, but they would also reduce the ledger’s appeal as a place to transact. The architects chose low fees to maximize utility, and the deflationary effect is a byproduct of that choice rather than the primary objective.
This matters because it shifts how the value thesis reads. XRP does not rely on scarcity alone. It relies on the ledger being genuinely useful and cost-effective enough that people continue to move value through it.
Schwartz identified XRP’s “unique advantages over other assets on XRPL” as the mechanism by which it captures value. He did not elaborate further in the post, but the reference points to XRP’s role as the ledger’s native asset, its use in bridging transactions, and its function in paying transaction fees.
Crypto enthusiast Archie shared the exchange on X, describing the statement as Schwartz spelling out the XRP thesis in three sentences. The full explanation now sits on the record, stated plainly by one of the people who built the ledger.
Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.
Follow us on X, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News
The post Ex-Ripple CTO Just Spelled Out the XRP Value Thesis appeared first on Times Tabloid.
