This article was first published on TurkishNY Radio. More publicly traded companies are adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, with most choosing to grow their holdings by purchasing more BT
This article was first published on TurkishNY Radio.
More publicly traded companies are adding Bitcoin to their balance sheets, with most choosing to grow their holdings by purchasing more BTC whenever they raise fresh capital.
However, UK-based B HODL Plc believes there may be a smarter way to increase shareholder exposure to Bitcoin.
According to the company’s official disclosures, its recent Bitcoin treasury share buyback delivered around 24% more Bitcoin per share than buying Bitcoin directly with the same amount of money.
The finding suggests that when a company’s stock trades below the value of the Bitcoin it already owns, buying back shares can create more value for existing shareholders.
According to B HODL Plc’s official buyback announcement, the company introduced a £100,000 share repurchase programme on July 9 after determining that its shares were undervalued compared with the Bitcoin held on its balance sheet.
Rather than using its available cash to purchase additional BTC, B HODL spent about £37,985 before fees to buy back 823,400 ordinary shares over five trading days.
After those shares were cancelled, each remaining share represented a slightly larger stake in the company’s Bitcoin reserves. B HODL said gross Bitcoin ownership increased from 117.77 satoshis per share to 118.46 satoshis per share, adding 0.69 satoshis per share.
By comparison, spending the same amount on Bitcoin at the market price would have increased holdings by only 0.557 satoshis per share.
Based on those figures, the company concluded that its Bitcoin treasury share buyback generated approximately 24% more Bitcoin exposure for shareholders than a direct Bitcoin purchase under the same market conditions.
How Bitcoin Treasury Share Buyback Added 24% More BTC Per Share The success of B HODL’s strategy came down to one key detail its shares were trading for less than the value of the Bitcoin the company already held.
According to B HODL’s official investor dashboard, the company owned 166.487 BTC. Based on the Bitcoin price displayed by the company, those holdings were valued at just over £8 million.
However, B HODL’s market capitalization was only about £7.38 million, meaning investors could buy exposure to the company’s Bitcoin at a discount through its shares.
That pricing gap created an opportunity for management.
Instead of spending cash to buy additional Bitcoin at the full market price, the company chose to repurchase its own undervalued shares.
Once those shares were cancelled, every remaining shareholder owned a slightly larger percentage of the existing Bitcoin treasury. As a result, shareholders gained greater Bitcoin exposure without the company having to purchase another coin.
This example shows why a Bitcoin treasury share buyback can sometimes be a more efficient use of capital than buying additional BTC, particularly when a company’s shares trade below the value of its Bitcoin holdings.
B HODL is not relying solely on share buybacks. The company is also keeping its at-the-market (ATM) share issuance programme in place as part of a broader capital management strategy.
According to the company, new shares will only be issued when doing so increases Bitcoin per share under its internal valuation model.
If the stock trades above the value of its underlying Bitcoin, issuing new equity can help raise capital without reducing shareholder value. On the other hand, if the shares fall below that value, buying them back may provide a better return for existing investors.
This balanced approach is attracting attention across the Bitcoin treasury sector. Rather than focusing only on growing total Bitcoin holdings, more companies are measuring success by how much Bitcoin each individual share represents.
As a result, investors are paying closer attention to capital allocation decisions and whether they strengthen or weaken Bitcoin ownership on a per-share basis.
While B HODL’s early results are encouraging, the company has also made it clear that the calculations focus only on gross Bitcoin per share. They do not reflect the company’s full net asset value (NAV), which provides a broader picture of its financial health.
A company’s overall value is influenced by much more than the Bitcoin it holds. Factors such as cash reserves, operating costs, outstanding debt, business assets, and future financing needs all play an important role in determining long-term shareholder value.
Because of this, the reported 24% improvement should not be seen as proof that share buybacks will always deliver better results than purchasing Bitcoin directly.
Instead, it highlights how a Bitcoin treasury share buyback can be particularly effective when a company’s shares are trading well below the value of the Bitcoin on its balance sheet.
How Bitcoin Treasury Share Buyback Added 24% More BTC Per Share As more publicly traded companies adopt Bitcoin treasury strategies, B HODL’s approach could attract wider attention across the market.
If a company’s shares continue to trade below the value of its Bitcoin holdings, management may find that repurchasing discounted shares creates more value for existing shareholders than simply buying additional BTC.
However, every company faces different financial circumstances, so decisions will still depend on available cash, debt levels, operating expenses, liquidity, and future capital requirements.
For now, B HODL’s first round of buybacks offers an example of how thoughtful capital management not just increasing Bitcoin holdings can strengthen shareholder exposure to Bitcoin over time.
1. Bitcoin Treasury Share Buyback A Bitcoin treasury share buyback is when a company purchases its own shares from the market. This reduces the number of shares in circulation, giving remaining shareholders a larger share of the company’s Bitcoin holdings.
2. Bitcoin Per Share Bitcoin per share shows how much Bitcoin is backed by each company share. Investors use this metric to understand how much Bitcoin exposure they receive through their investment.
3. Satoshi (Sat) A satoshi, or “sat,” is the smallest unit of Bitcoin. One Bitcoin equals 100 million satoshis, making it easier to measure very small amounts of BTC.
4. Net Asset Value (NAV) Net asset value (NAV) is the difference between a company’s total assets and its liabilities. It provides a clearer picture of the company’s overall financial value beyond just its Bitcoin holdings.
5. Market Capitalization Market capitalization, or market cap, is the total value of a company’s outstanding shares based on the current share price. It helps investors compare the size of publicly traded companies.
6. At-the-Market (ATM) Share Issuance An ATM share issuance program allows a company to sell new shares gradually into the public market instead of issuing them all at once, helping it raise capital more flexibly.
7. Bitcoin Treasury Company A Bitcoin treasury company is a business that keeps Bitcoin as part of its corporate treasury or balance sheet, using it as a long-term financial asset alongside traditional holdings.
8. Share Repurchase Programme A share repurchase programme is when a company buys back its own shares from investors. By reducing the number of shares available, each remaining shareholder owns a slightly larger portion of the business.
A Bitcoin treasury share buyback is when a company buys back its own shares from the market. This gives existing shareholders a slightly larger ownership stake in the company’s Bitcoin holdings.
B HODL believed its shares were trading below the value of its Bitcoin reserves. Buying back those discounted shares gave shareholders more Bitcoin exposure than purchasing BTC directly.
Not always. It mainly works when a company’s shares are undervalued. Businesses also need to consider cash flow, debt, operating costs, and future funding needs.
It’s possible. As more companies hold Bitcoin, some may choose share buybacks when their stock trades below the value of their Bitcoin reserves, depending on their financial position.
