This article was first published on Deythere. Crypto has become arguably one of the most influential forces in US politics. Less than 4 years after the FTX disaster triggered calls for aggres
This article was first published on Deythere.
Crypto has become arguably one of the most influential forces in US politics. Less than 4 years after the FTX disaster triggered calls for aggressive enforcement, the Digital asset industry is now investing millions in crypto political spending, spreading its influence across both the major parties, helping pick the winners of key congressional races, and transforming the regulatory environment surrounding crypto itself.
This has been a wild ride. Though it initially started out as a fight against the SEC and Gary Gensler, it has grown into a full-on campaign operation backed by exchanges, venture capital firms, stablecoin issuers, and blockchain companies.
The change came after the FTX collapse late 2022. Regulators came out aggressively and the SEC hit crypto operators with 46 enforcement actions in 2023. The likes of Coinbase, Binance and Ripple faced the heat as regulators argued that many digital assets should be treated like securities.
Investment giant Andreessen Horowitz became one of the earliest companies to expand its lobbying efforts in Washington.
The rest of the industry took note and soon started calling in the same shots to influence lawmakers directly instead of fighting case by case.
Crypto Political SpendingThe industry’s most influential political group became Fairshake, a superPAC backed by Coinbase, Ripple, Andreessen Horowitz, and others.
Fairshake and its affiliates adopted a simple strategy: back candidates from all parties who are willing to support crypto-friendly legislation.
Republican candidates received support through Defend American Jobs, while Democratic candidates were backed through Protect Progress.
This crypto political spending and backing approach produced results during the 2024 election cycle.
Crypto-backed PACs spent approximately $139 million across 58 House and Senate races. Around 85% of supported candidates won their elections. In New York alone, the network spent $5.3 million backing Democratic candidates.
The crypto political spending didn’t stop after the elections either. Reports claim crypto PACs are sitting on war chests of up to $200 million for the 2026 midterm elections, which would put them in the top tier of outside spenders in the country.
As the crypto political spending influence grew, so did many regulatory changes occur.
In Feb 2025, the SEC dropped its civil case against Coinbase in an effort to clear up the regulatory framework. That was followed by it dropping its case against Binance in one of the biggest enforcement actions from the previous administration.
In Congress, the GENIUS Act was signed into law in July 2025; this established a much-needed federal framework for stablecoins in the US, something that the industry had been pushing for years.
Ripple also got the much-needed good news. After years of fighting over XRP’s classification, they secured a settlement that took away a lot of uncertainty.
Critics claim that the timing of these developments raises red flags about the potential for political influence. Representatives like Maxine Waters and Brad Sherman have questioned whether regulatory reversals and industry spending are becoming too closely linked.
Crypto Political SpendingThe most obvious sign of crypto’s political strategy came into view in Texas.
Protect Progress dropped $5 million supporting Democratic challenger Christian Menefee in the Texas 18th Congressional District runoff and another $2.8 million to try and knock out Representative Al Green after he voted against the GENIUS Act and the Clarity Act.
While all this was going down, the Tether-backed Fellowship PAC put out $1.75 million to back up Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in his Senate runoff against incumbent John Cornyn.
Paxton’s win was one of the most watched elections in the country. Industry-backed groups were active on both sides of the political aisle
So far this year, crypto PAC spending on congressional candidates in Texas alone has gone past $2.5 million, which is already more than double the $1 million spent across the entire 2024 cycle.
Crypto political spending has become one of the main forces in modern American elections. It merely started out as a response to regulatory pressure over FTX but has developed into a sophisticated lobbying network capable of mapping races, influencing legislation, and altering regulatory priorities.
Supporters see this as just the industry pushing back against years of over-regulation. But others think that the influx of cash into politics is a matter of concern because it gives powerful crypto firms outsized influence over the rules governing the sector.
Either way, the pattern is getting harder and harder to ignore. The future of crypto regulation is no longer just being decided in courtrooms and at regulatory agencies, but also at the ballot box.
Crypto PAC: A political action committee that is funded by cryptocurrency companies or their supporters.
Fairshake: One of the biggest crypto-backed super PACs active in US elections.
SEC: The US Securities and Exchange Commission.
GENIUS Act: A federal law that set out to establish a regulatory framework for stablecoins.
Stablecoin: A type of cryptocurrency that is designed to keep its value level, usually fixed to the value of the US dollar.
It’s simply the money spent by crypto companies and their industry-backed PACs to try and influence elections and public policy.
Crypto-backed PACs spent around $139 million on House and Senate races.
Fairshake is a bipartisan crypto-backed super PAC supported by companies including Coinbase and Ripple.
Texas has become a major area where crypto-backed PACs are actively funding congressional and Senate races.
The industry’s growing influence has coincided with major policy changes, including dismissed SEC cases and the passage of the GENIUS Act.
