Michael Saylor defended Strategy’s capital-raising approach during a discussion with Jack Mallers at BTC Prague. The debate centered on multiple-to-net asset value (mNAV), convertible debt tr
Strategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor and Strike and Twenty One Capital (XXI) CEO Jack Mallers discussed how investors should evaluate Strategy’s increasingly complex capital structure during a session at BTC Prague on Wednesday.
I asked:
1) How does he define mNAV? People are including out-of-the-money securities. Does he agree with that?
2) What is an example of a dilutive transaction if selling equity for dollars isn’t dilutive.
Pretty basic questions and I was asking them genuinely. How is that… https://t.co/DiL1fTpz1L
— Jack Mallers (@jackmallers) June 10, 2026
Mallers asked Saylor whether out-of-the-money securities should be included when calculating mNAV, referencing Strategy’s approximately $6.7 billion in convertible debt that is currently not expected to convert into common equity at the company’s current share price.
Saylor responded that investors can calculate mNAV by including the notional value of convertible debt, common equity, and preferred equity. However, he said mNAV is only one framework among several available for evaluating the company.
According to Saylor, investors may also focus on gross assets per share or net assets per share, which may treat preferred equity and convertible debt differently depending on the methodology used.
Mallers also challenged Saylor’s position on shareholder dilution, asking what would constitute a dilutive transaction if issuing equity for cash is not considered dilution.
Saylor said issuing equity in exchange for cash does not automatically dilute shareholders because investors receive a tangible asset in return.
According to Saylor, capital raises increase the company’s asset base, improve liquidity, and strengthen its credit profile. He cited Strategy’s recent increase in U.S. dollar reserves, which he said now total approximately $1 billion following the addition of around $100 million in cash.
Saylor maintained that whether capital is raised and held as cash or converted into Bitcoin, the transaction adds assets to the balance sheet rather than reducing shareholder value.
The BTC Prague discussion comes as Strategy’s latest Bitcoin purchase and financing strategy continue to generate debate among investors.
For those who have been listening to orange-tie wearing idiots about MSTR dilution, you should realize that Strategy’s own website demonstrates that the capital raise over the weekend was dilutive to MSTR shareholders. See the BTC Yield columns and how they moved down from 6/1 to… pic.twitter.com/pje8XHQK5M
— Matthew R. Kratter #BIP-110 (@mattkratter) June 9, 2026
Recent criticism has focused on whether the company’s latest capital raise was accretive or dilutive to existing shareholders. The debate has expanded to include the effectiveness of Bitcoin-per-share metrics and the treatment of convertible debt and preferred securities when evaluating shareholder returns.
Responding to criticism on X, Saylor emphasized that Strategy’s BTC Yield metric is designed solely to measure Bitcoin-per-share accretion.
“BTC Yield is a narrow KPI used to assess per-share accretion solely as it pertains to bitcoin holdings. It is not a measure of financial performance, valuation, liquidity, ROI, book value, or stockholder return.”
Saylor added that a complete assessment of Strategy requires reviewing the company’s financial statements and regulatory disclosures rather than relying on a single metric.
