
Markets6 min read
Tesla (TSLA) Nedir?
Tesla, elektrikli araçlarıyla tanınan ancak faaliyet alanı otomobillerle sınırlı olmayan ABD merkezli bir teknoloji ve enerji şirketidir. Şirket; elektrikli araçların yanında enerji depolama,
Pons Protocol: How Fee Revenue Supports Buybacks and Token Burns Every trade on pons generates fees, and where those fees actually go says a lot about how the PONS Protocol is built. This bre
Every trade on pons generates fees, and where those fees actually go says a lot about how the PONS Protocol is built. This breaks down the fee split, the buyback mechanism, and the vesting structure behind it sourced directly from pons' own official documentation.
Key takeaways:
Creators keep 70% of trading fees on current launches (90% on older, legacy launches), with the protocol keeping the rest.
The protocol routes 80% of its own fee share into buying back and permanently burning the token.
A separate, optional feature lets individual token creators buy back their own launched tokens too but those aren't burned, they're vested over five years instead.
Pons is a launch protocol built for Robinhood Chain. Pons Launchpad is the actual product: the interface where anyone can create a token, browse other launches, open any token to see its details, and trade straight from their own wallet.
The launchpad never holds anyone's funds. Every launch and every trade is a transaction your wallet asks you to approve directly, so nothing moves without your signature.
Pons-Protocol is the underlying system that makes the Pons launchpad work the set of rules governing how tokens launch, how trading fees split between creators and the protocol, and how the protocol's own revenue gets used. The launchpad is what you interact with; the ecosystem is the logic running underneath it.
With that foundation covered, here's how the fee side of Pons-Protocol tokenomics actually works.
Every trade generates liquidity fees in both the launched token and WETH. The network keeps a share, and the token's creator keeps the rest.
This Pons-Protocol fee split is snapshotted the moment a token launches and never changes afterward, no matter how the token performs later. Two different splits currently exist, depending on when a token launched:
Current launches: Creator keeps 70%, protocol keeps 30%, applying to tokens launched through the active factory starting at block 8991118.
Legacy launches: Creator keeps 90%, protocol keeps 10%, applying to tokens launched through the original factory starting at block 8600612.
Creator rewards accrue directly in the token's locked position rather than sitting in a separate wallet. Whenever they're available, the creator can claim them at any time. If a creator leaves them unclaimed, pons-automation can claim and route the funds to the creator's payout wallet instead so the split gets honored either way, even if the creator stops checking in.
Once the protocol collects its share of fees, that revenue doesn't just sit idle. A manual buyback currently runs through an automated TWAP (time-weighted average price) mechanism, using 80% of all network fees collected.
The remaining 20% of Pons Protocol revenue goes toward infrastructure costs and expanding the team: the operational side of keeping the network running.
As per official documentation, this 80/20 split isn't locked in permanently yet. It's expected to become immutable, decentralized, and fully automated in a future release, but for now it runs as a manual process on the team's side.
So how do Pons-Protocol buybacks actually work in practice? The 80% share of Network fees gets used to buy the token itself on the open market, continuously, through that TWAP mechanism rather than as a single large purchase.
Buying gradually over time, instead of all at once, is meant to reduce the price impact any single buyback would otherwise have a large one-time purchase can move a thin market sharply, while a time-weighted approach spreads that pressure out.
Here's where the Pons-Protocol buyback and burn mechanism actually completes the loop: once Pons tokens are bought back through that TWAP process, they're sent to the burn address. That permanently removes them from circulating supply.
This directly changes how the token's market cap should be read. Pons-documentation defines a burn-adjusted market cap as:
Burn-adjusted market cap = price × (total supply − burned supply)
That formula matters because a standard market cap calculation, using total supply alone, would overstate real circulating value once burns start reducing supply. It's also worth being clear-eyed about one thing it states directly: burning does not guarantee a higher price. It permanently reduces supply, but demand still has to hold up independently for that to translate into price movement.
It's worth separating the mechanism above which burns the token itself from a second, different buyback feature available to any creator launching their own token through pons.
A creator can choose to have part of their own fee share spent buying their token back off the market. This comes out of the creator's own share, never out of a trader's, and it's entirely optional per launch.
Unlike the protocol-level mechanism, tokens bought back this way are not burned. They're locked away and released gradually over five years, split between the creator and the network. Nobody receives a lump sum, and there's no single point where a large stockpile of previously bought-back tokens can suddenly return to the market at once.
The vesting runs on a weighted five-year clock, so later buybacks don't ride on the progress of earlier ones a large buyback made this month can't become withdrawable immediately just because a launch has been buying back for years already.
Releasing vested tokens can be triggered by either side of the split, the creator or pons, and whichever one calls it pays out both shares. That means a creator who's stopped paying attention doesn't strand the ecosystem portion, and a creator can always claim their own share without waiting on anyone else.
If a buyback can't be executed sensibly because there's too little liquidity, or it would move the price too far it's simply skipped, and that money goes to the creator as normal instead. A buyback going wrong on one launch can't hold up fees owed on any other. (Source: official V2 documentation).
Mechanism
Applies To
Split / Structure
Trading fee split (current)
New launches
Creator 70% · Protocol 30%
Trading fee split (legacy)
Older launches
Creator 90% · Protocol 10%
Protocol revenue use
Protocol's fee share
80% buyback (TWAP) · 20% operations
Protocol buyback destination
Pons-token
Bought back, then burned permanently
Per-launch creator buyback
Individual launched tokens
Optional, locked, vested over 5 years
Put together, this Pons Protocol economics model tries to align three different groups without shortchanging any of them: traders generate the fees, creators get a snapshotted, unchangeable share of what their launch produces, and the network routes its own share into reducing supply over time rather than just banking it. Whether that translates into sustained price support depends on demand, not just the mechanism but the structure itself is transparent enough to verify on-chain.
It splits its fees clearly, burns what the network earns, and lets individual creators run their own vested buybacks separately. It's a fee model built to be checked on-chain, not just taken on trust.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. All figures and mechanisms described are sourced directly from official documentation and may change as the network updates. Cryptocurrency tokens can be highly volatile, illiquid, or lose all value. Always do your own research before transacting.