The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule IA-6240, titled "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets," on February 15, 2023, extending custody protections to all client assets held
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission proposed rule IA-6240, titled "Safeguarding Advisory Client Assets," on February 15, 2023, extending custody protections to all client assets held by registered investment advisers, including crypto assets, under an asset-neutral safeguarding regime built around qualified custodians. The SEC crypto custody framework is a proposal, not a final rule, and its scope is limited to registered investment advisers, not exchanges or retail self-custody arrangements.
IA-6240 would replace and expand the existing Investment Advisers Act custody rule, shifting from a narrower "funds and securities" definition to an asset-neutral standard that covers any client asset in an adviser's possession or control. Crypto assets held for advisory clients fall within that expanded scope. For related coverage, see SEC Chair Paul Atkins Proposes New Crypto Regulations.
The proposal requires advisers to use qualified custodians and obtain written assurances from those custodians. It does not establish a universal custody standard for crypto exchanges, retail platforms, or individual self-custody holders, distinctions that competing media coverage has frequently obscured. For context on how SEC Chair Paul Atkins has approached broader crypto regulation, the agency's posture on digital-asset oversight has been evolving in parallel. For related coverage, see Ethena Foundation Proposes Fee Switch for ENA Token Buybacks.
The proposal targets registered investment advisers managing client assets. Custodians, sub-custodians, and prime brokers seeking to service those advisers would face indirect pressure to qualify under the rule's written-assurance requirements, potentially shrinking the pool of eligible crypto custodians.
Commissioner Hester M. Peirce stated directly that "the proposal would expand the reach of the custody requirements to crypto assets while likely shrinking the ranks of qualified crypto custodians," per her statement on the SEC's official site. That tension, broader investor protection versus a narrower custodian market, is the central operational friction in the SEC record.
"The proposal would expand the reach of the custody requirements to crypto assets while likely shrinking the ranks of qualified crypto custodians." — Commissioner Hester M. Peirce, SEC Statement, Feb. 15, 2023
The adviser-centric scope also means self-custody arrangements, where a holder controls their own private keys, sit outside the proposal's direct reach. Debates over self-custody at the state level, such as legislative efforts that threaten to restrict crypto self-custody, represent a separate regulatory track from this federal adviser-focused rule. Similarly, international frameworks like the FCA's proposed crypto ETN cap for UK retail funds illustrate the divergence between retail-facing and adviser-facing custody standards globally.
Per Commissioner Peirce's statement, the proposal contemplated a one-year compliance period for large advisers and an eighteen-month window for smaller advisers, with a public comment period of sixty days after Federal Register publication.
Proposed large-adviser compliance period 1 year Proposed timeline cited in Commissioner Peirce's SEC statement.Smaller advisers would receive an eighteen-month runway under the proposed schedule, providing additional time to either qualify custodians or restructure advisory relationships to avoid triggering the rule.
Proposed smaller-adviser compliance period 18 months Proposed timeline cited in Commissioner Peirce's SEC statement.The four variables to monitor as the proposal develops: final scope of the "qualified custodian" definition for crypto assets; whether written-assurance requirements can be met by existing crypto-native custodians; the comment record's influence on the final rule text; and any subsequent SEC action following the comment period. The SEC's concurrent work on token securities lifecycle policy could intersect with custody obligations depending on how digital assets are ultimately classified.
KEY PROPOSAL METRICS
Final implications hinge on the SEC's published rule text following the comment period and any subsequent amendments. The proposal as filed represents one regulatory data point in an evolving adviser-custody landscape, not a finalized custody mandate for the broader crypto market.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Cryptocurrency and digital asset markets carry significant risk. Always do your own research before making decisions.
Read original article on marketbit.net
