BTC/USD $68,420 +2.8%
ETH/USD $3,540 +1.4%
SOL/USD $142.80 -0.6%
BNB/USD $605.20 +0.9%
XRP/USD $0.62 -1.2%
DOGE/USD $0.18 +5.4%
BTC/USD $68,420 +2.8%
ETH/USD $3,540 +1.4%
SOL/USD $142.80 -0.6%
BNB/USD $605.20 +0.9%
XRP/USD $0.62 -1.2%
DOGE/USD $0.18 +5.4%
Policy

SEC Unveils Crypto Securities Exemptions for Offerings Up…

What Is The SEC Proposing For Crypto Securities? The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed its first major permanent rule specifically governing crypto assets, offering compani

AnonymousCryptoCompass newsroom
August 18, 2026
5 min read
NEWS
Hero article visual / chart / editorial image
CryptoCompass editorial visual for policy coverage.

The SEC Meets Friday to Propose a Registration Off-Ramp for Token Issuers

What Is The SEC Proposing For Crypto Securities?

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has proposed its first major permanent rule specifically governing crypto assets, offering companies two new routes to sell crypto securities without meeting the full requirements normally attached to registered securities offerings. The proposal, called Regulation Crypto Assets, would create a framework for issuers seeking to raise capital through digital assets while setting disclosure and reporting requirements based on the size of an offering. The move gives the SEC a more formal role in writing crypto-specific rules after years in which the agency relied heavily on existing securities laws and enforcement actions. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the agency was establishing “a new course with a package of exemptions that would facilitate capital formation and allow crypto asset innovation to flourish in the United States in the years ahead.” The proposal arrived unexpectedly after the SEC cancelled an August 14 meeting where it had been scheduled to consider the same rule, citing an unforeseen scheduling issue.

How Would The New Crypto Exemptions Work?

The SEC proposal creates two tracks for crypto securities offerings. The first would allow a one-time startup offering of up to $5 million during a four-year period. The second would permit substantially larger offerings of up to $75 million during each one-year period. Issuers using either exemption would have to provide investors with principles-based narrative disclosures. Companies using the larger exemption would face additional requirements, including financial statements and continuing reporting obligations. The structure attempts to create a lighter route for early-stage projects while imposing more extensive disclosure requirements on issuers raising larger amounts of capital. That could reduce the cost of accessing U.S. investors for some crypto businesses without removing investor-protection requirements altogether. The proposal also addresses one of the longest-running questions in U.S. crypto regulation: when a digital asset stops being tied to an investment contract. Under the proposed safe harbor, a crypto asset could avoid continuing treatment as an investment contract after its issuer has completed or permanently ended the essential managerial efforts it previously promised investors. “In line with the commission’s earlier interpretative guidance, this proposal would also allow for a safe harbor once an issuer has completed or permanently ceased all essential managerial efforts that it represented or promised it would take under an investment contract,” Atkins said.

Investor Takeaway

The SEC proposal could lower the legal barrier for some U.S. crypto fundraising while giving projects a clearer route out of investment-contract treatment. For investors, the important details will be the disclosure standards, ongoing reporting rules and conditions projects must meet before qualifying for the safe harbor.

When Could Regulation Crypto Assets Take Effect?

The rule is still at an early stage. The SEC has opened a 60-day public comment period, allowing crypto companies, investors, lawyers and other market participants to submit feedback on the proposal. After the comment window closes, the commission is expected to review the submissions and determine whether to revise the framework before voting on a final rule. That process can take several months or longer, meaning the exemptions are not immediately available to issuers. The proposal is also separate from the SEC’s planned “innovation exemption” for tokenized securities. That initiative has not yet been formally released and is expected to address a different part of the digital asset market. For crypto companies, the distinction matters. Regulation Crypto Assets is focused on how crypto securities can be offered and when assets may cease to fall within an investment-contract framework, while the separate exemption is expected to deal more directly with tokenized securities products and market infrastructure.

Can The SEC Act Without Congress?

The proposal arrives while Congress is still trying to complete the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, a broader market structure bill intended to establish lasting rules for digital assets and divide regulatory responsibilities across federal agencies. The Senate has only a narrow legislative window remaining before lawmakers leave Washington for an extended recess ahead of the midterm elections. Failure to complete the bill would leave the SEC and other regulators carrying more of the burden for shaping crypto policy through agency rulemaking. Atkins made clear that he does not view SEC action as a substitute for legislation. He said congressional action remains “indispensable” to creating rules durable enough to survive changes in leadership at federal regulatory agencies. That creates two parallel tracks for the industry. The SEC can begin providing exemptions and defining how securities laws apply to crypto assets, but Congress would still need to establish the wider legal framework governing trading platforms, token classification and regulatory jurisdiction. For issuers, Regulation Crypto Assets could become the most immediate route toward operating under a crypto-specific federal rulebook. For investors, the bigger question is whether the proposal eventually becomes part of a broader statutory framework or remains dependent on SEC policy that a future commission could revise.