Unexpected Twist in $3.8 Million Crypto Attack: Hacker Returns All the Money! Here Are the Details
NEAR Intents announced that the $3.8 million received during the security breach has been fully refunded. The refund came after the announcement that the attacker’s identity had been determin
A
AnonymousCryptoCompass newsroom
October 5, 2026
2 min read
NEWS
CryptoCompass editorial visual for bitcoin coverage.
NEAR Intents announced that the $3.8 million received during the security breach has been fully refunded. The refund came after the announcement that the attacker’s identity had been determined.
NEAR Intents, a cross-chain transaction infrastructure operating within the NEAR ecosystem, announced that it has recovered all funds lost in a security incident involving approximately $3.8 million. According to a statement by the platform’s general manager, Alex Shevchenko, the individual associated with the attack returned the assets in full after the 48-hour grace period granted to them.
The incident stemmed from a flaw in the interaction between the Omni deposit and withdrawal infrastructure and the NEAR Intents smart contract. Following the discovery of the security issue, some services were temporarily suspended, and the team announced that affected users would be fully compensated. On-chain researcher ZachXBT reported that some of the funds related to the incident were sent to KuCoin and subsequently transferred to the Bitcoin network.
The NEAR Intents team announced they had identified the perpetrator of the attack and gave them 48 hours to return the funds under the guise of “responsible disclosure.” Shevchenko later stated that the entire $3.8 million had been returned and the investigation into the incident had been stopped. He also urged security researchers to use bug bounty programs instead of disrupting services.
While the refund is a significant development that reduces the likelihood of users experiencing direct losses, it doesn’t mean the technical flaw in the infrastructure was insignificant. The critical issue going forward will be how the vulnerability was fixed, whether similar interactions were re-examined, and what security controls were implemented when services were reopened. The statement also doesn’t suggest a general recovery method applicable to all crypto attacks; the result was achieved thanks to the specific circumstances of this incident.
Avalanche's Snowman consensus delivers sub-second finality by having validators repeatedly query small, randomly chosen groups of their peers instead of contacting the entire network at once,
In 2014, an early Bitcoin investor set out to buy a house with crypto and ran into a wall: he had the coins and the conviction, but his brokers, Stephan Burke and Carol Cassis, could not find
The CLARITY Act failed because the Senate rejected cloture on the motion to proceed by a vote of 49 to 50 on September 15, 2026, falling 11 votes short of the 60 needed to open floor debate,