The GENIUS Act, short for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, is the first standalone federal law regulating payment stablecoins in the United States. P
The GENIUS Act, short for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act, is the first standalone federal law regulating payment stablecoins in the United States. President Donald Trump signed it on July 18, 2025, after the bill cleared the Senate 68-30 and the House 308-122. It sets out who may issue dollar-pegged stablecoins in the US, what must back them, and which regulators supervise the whole system.
One year later, the law sits in a strange spot. The stablecoin market has climbed to roughly $315 billion. Yet the federal agencies writing the actual rulebook missed their statutory deadline on July 18, 2026, without finalizing a single implementing rule. The law is reshaping the industry anyway.
The law targets payment stablecoins only: digital assets designed for payments or settlement that the issuer must redeem at a fixed value. Bank deposits, national currencies, and securities fall outside its scope.
Only Permitted Payment Stablecoin Issuers, or PPSIs, can issue these tokens in the US. There are three routes in:
Once inside, the core rules are strict:
Before this law, stablecoin issuers operated in a regulatory gray zone, supervised piecemeal by state regulators or not at all. The GENIUS Act moves them into bank-like federal oversight, giving holders enforceable redemption rights and reserve guarantees for the first time. That legal certainty is what lets banks, payment networks, and corporates treat stablecoins as workable infrastructure for payments, settlement, and collateral rather than a compliance risk. It also serves a policy goal Washington states openly: keeping the dollar dominant in digital finance by making the regulated on-chain dollar a US product.
This is where the picture gets messy. The law gave regulators one year to finalize implementing rules. That year ran out with Treasury, the OCC, the FDIC, the NCUA, and the Federal Reserve having published roughly ten notices of proposed rulemaking between them, none of which reached final form. Several comment periods run past the deadline itself, some into August 2026.
The miss does not pause the law. Core provisions take effect on the earlier of January 18, 2027, or 120 days after final rules land. And the hardest deadline still stands: from July 18, 2028, digital asset service providers may no longer offer or sell non-permitted payment stablecoins to US persons, with limited safe harbors. Issuers are preparing for a regime whose fine print could still change.
The two largest issuers have taken opposite paths that say a lot about how the law sorts the market.
Circle (@circle) leaned in. The $USDC issuer applied for an OCC national trust bank charter on June 30, 2025, and received final approval on July 10, 2026, to establish First National Digital Currency Bank, operating as Circle National Trust. The charter enables federally regulated custody, with USDC reserve management planned as a future capability. Circle has long argued the law essentially codifies its existing practices: monthly attestations and reserves held in cash and short-term Treasuries.
Tether (@tether), incorporated in El Salvador, faces the foreign issuer route: a Treasury comparability determination for its home regime, OCC registration, and US liquidity requirements. Rather than wait, it launched a separate US-focused stablecoin, $USAT, in January 2026, issued by federally chartered Anchorage Digital Bank with Cantor Fitzgerald as reserve custodian. $USDT, at roughly $184 billion the largest stablecoin by market cap, continues serving global users while Tether says it is progressing toward GENIUS compliance for the domestic market.
Beyond the big two, Paxos and a wave of bank and credit union entrants are pursuing PPSI status. Traditional finance is moving too: Visa, Mastercard, and JPMorgan have all expanded stablecoin products since the law passed. The pattern is clear: the law rewards well-capitalized, transparent issuers and pressures offshore or opaque ones to adapt or retreat from US exposure.
The GENIUS Act covers one product. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, or CLARITY Act (H.R. 3633), is the companion bill meant to cover everything else: which digital assets count as securities versus commodities, how the SEC and CFTC split jurisdiction, and how exchanges, brokers, and custodians are regulated. It generally carves permitted payment stablecoins out of certain securities definitions, so the two laws are designed to interlock.
Their fortunes have diverged sharply. CLARITY passed the House 294-134 on July 17, 2025, one day before GENIUS was signed, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced it 15-9 on May 14, 2026. In mid-July 2026, Senate Republicans released a merged text combining the Banking and Agriculture Committee versions, and Majority Leader John Thune has pledged a floor vote before the August recess, with the week of July 20 as the target. But the draft omits the ethics provisions several Democrats have named as the price of their votes, and the bill still needs roughly seven of them to clear 60. The window before the August 7 recess is widely seen as the last realistic shot at passage in 2026.
That leaves US crypto policy half-built. Stablecoins have a federal rulebook without final rules, while the market structure bill meant to complete the picture still awaits its Senate test. The 2028 ban on non-permitted stablecoins is already on the calendar either way.
Sources:
