
DeFi3 min read
Spark Vulnerability Mitigated
A vulnerability was identified via responsible disclosure and has been mitigated in the Spark protocol. It affects multi-input Spark spends only; single-input spends are unaffected. Your wall
Ripple spent the first half of 2026 building faster than $XRP could keep up with. From January through June, the XRP Ledger set records for network activity, tokenized assets and stablecoin a
Ripple spent the first half of 2026 building faster than $XRP could keep up with. From January through June, the XRP Ledger set records for network activity, tokenized assets and stablecoin adoption, while Ripple signed deals across banking, payments and custody on four continents. Yet XRP itself lost close to half its value over the same six months. That gap between a busy ledger and a falling token is the defining story of Ripple's H1, and it is one the market still has not resolved.
Messari's State of XRP Q1 2026 report is the clearest snapshot of the quarter. The headline figures point in two directions at once:
The slide did not stop with Q1. By the end of June, XRP was trading near $1.03, its weakest level since late 2024 and down roughly 50% from where it started the year. It has since edged back toward $1.10 in early July. ETFs were among the few direct sources of demand for XRP, since they buy the token on the open market. Cumulative inflows reached about $1.43 billion by mid-June and neared $1.48 billion by quarter's end, though the funds logged their first net outflow in weeks on June 30.
If XRP was the laggard, $RLUSD was the growth engine. It ran through most of Ripple's H1 announcements:
@Ripple’s wider payments platform passed $100 billion in processed volume in early March, after folding in its Palisade and Rail acquisitions to turn Ripple Payments into a single fiat-and-stablecoin pipe for businesses. Garlinghouse has said RLUSD reached the top ten stablecoins about 18 months after launch.
This is the question every XRP holder asked in H1, and the answer is fairly plain. Most of Ripple's 2026 wins run on RLUSD, not XRP. When a cross-border payment settles in RLUSD on the XRP Ledger, XRP's only role is to cover the network fee, which amounts to a fraction of a cent per transaction. That is real usage, but it does not create the kind of buying pressure that moves a token with tens of billions in market cap. Analysts repeatedly noted that none of Ripple's headline deals this year used XRP as the settlement asset. For now, XRP's price has tracked the broader market and macro rate fears far more closely than anything happening on its own ledger.
Ripple's H1 deal flow was heavy on institutions and geography. A chronological run-through of the highlights:
The SBI launch was the standout. Following approval from Japan's Financial Services Agency, RLUSD became the country's first "Type 4" foreign stablecoin, distributed to retail and institutional users through SBI VC Trade. The fine print was more modest than the billing, though. RLUSD went live in Japan on Ethereum rather than the XRP Ledger, and each transaction is capped at about one million yen, roughly $6,200.
Three shifts under the hood mattered as much as the deal flow.
On the technical side, XRPL shipped a set of institutional DeFi tools in Q1. Permissioned Domains, a Permissioned DEX and Token Escrow all went live, while native lending and asset vaults stayed in validator voting. Other work in progress included multi-purpose tokens for real-world assets, batch transactions and the EVM sidechain for programmability. That feature push showed up in the data: RWAs on XRPL hit an all-time high of $2.25 billion at the end of Q1, up 124% QoQ, which lifted the ledger into the top group of networks for tokenized assets, and to fourth by the time Messari published. Named issuers included Ondo, OpenEden and Guggenheim.
Ripple also leaned into machine-driven payments. On June 9, it released the XRPL AI Starter Kit and was named a launch partner for Mastercard's Agent Pay for Machines initiative, while XRPL was added as a supported chain on x402, an open protocol that lets AI agents pay for services like APIs and compute in XRP and RLUSD without human sign-off.
On the funding side, Ripple announced in late February that it is moving from a centralized grant model to a more distributed one, after deploying more than $550 million into XRPL initiatives since 2017 across nearly 200 projects. The new structure spreads decisions across several groups:
The regulatory backdrop improved over the first half. The SEC and CFTC jointly classified XRP as a digital commodity in March, easing a long-standing legal overhang, and the CLARITY Act, which would write that status into federal law, cleared the Senate Banking Committee in a 15-9 vote on May 14. It has sat on the Senate calendar since June 1, eligible for a floor vote but not yet a scheduled one, with the White House's July 4 signing target already missed and disputes over ethics rules and stablecoin yield still unresolved. The Senate returns from recess with a narrow window before August, which supporters treat as the last realistic shot this year. Ripple's conditional OCC trust charter also moved forward.
The clearest sign of Ripple's direction came in mid-June. In a Fox Business interview, CEO Brad Garlinghouse (@bgarlinghouse) said the company expects to end 2026 with a $1 billion annualized revenue run rate and pointedly excluded the XRP on its balance sheet from that figure. That captures the whole of H1: a company working hard to be judged on payments, stablecoins, custody and brokerage revenue, and a token still waiting for that work to show up in its price.
Sources: