Anyone holding VANRY has had exactly thirty days since August 11, 2026 for an action nobody will take on their behalf. Vanar's token is moving to the Base network, the swap runs through a por
Anyone holding VANRY has had exactly thirty days since August 11, 2026 for an action nobody will take on their behalf. Vanar's token is moving to the Base network, the swap runs through a portal operated by the project, and that portal closes on September 10, 2026 at 13:00 UTC. After that, the route through the portal is shut.
The case would be unremarkable were it not for three dates that interlock, sit in three different places and mean different things. Binance removed VANRY from spot trading today, August 17, 2026 at 03:00 UTC, and is still allowing withdrawals until October 17. Anyone taking their bearings from that figure treats as decisive a date that falls five weeks after the one that actually counts. And anyone who staked VANRY has to act earlier still, because a cooldown of 21 days stands in the way.
The three dates are not interchangeable, and none of them replaces another. The order below is the order in which they reach a holder.
August 19, 2026: staking of VANRY closes, and it is also the last day for which staking rewards accrue. This detail comes from the official Vanar swap portal itself.
September 10, 2026, 13:00 UTC: the swap window closes. It is the same cut-off for two different actions: by then the swap has to be completed through the portal, and by then a holder whose tokens are staked has to have at least initiated unstaking.
October 17, 2026, 03:00 UTC: Binance ends withdrawals for the old VANRY token. This date concerns only the question of how long the tokens can leave the exchange. For the swap itself it carries no weight, because by that point the swap has been closed for five weeks.
Between September 10 and October 17 there is therefore a stretch of 37 days in which a holder can still pull tokens off Binance but can no longer swap them through the portal. In practice that is the most dangerous section of the whole process, because everything there works and nothing gets done.
The portal opened on August 11, 2026 at 13:00 UTC and runs for thirty days. The project writes this in its FAQ in so many words: "There is only one swap window." For the period afterwards it is equally clear: "Late migration is not available through the portal after the 30-day window closes."
The project dates the official migration announcement to August 5, 2026. One day before the portal opened, on August 10, trading liquidity on decentralised exchanges on Ethereum was removed, according to the same portal. That is why a holder can no longer easily dispose of the old token there and why the swap is the regular route.
The exchange itself runs one for one. For 1.00 old VANRY you receive 1.00 new VANRY on Base. The project states that it charges no fee for the migration; the network fee for the transaction on the source chain is paid by the holder.
The Binance announcement of August 3, 2026 said it would remove all spot trading pairs for six tokens, VANRY among them. That took effect today at 03:00 UTC. On VANRY the notice carries a statement the other five assets do not get: the exchange does not support the forthcoming contract change and refers holders who want to swap to the project's migration portal. It does not handle the swap.
We wrote up the delisting itself and its consequences for the other five assets on August 14 in a separate piece, which also covers the choice between selling and withdrawing: Binance delisting of six tokens. There the question of a later swap stayed open, because no date was available at the time. That date is now available, and it is September 10.
For a holder whose VANRY sits on Binance, this produces a sequence that admits no shortcut: withdraw first, then swap. Both have to be finished before September 10, and the withdrawal takes time of its own, because a payout from an exchange is not a matter of minutes once checks and network load are factored in.
The two dates sit in different places, and that is the heart of the problem. Open your account at Binance and you see the withdrawal deadline. A holder unaware of the migration reads that as having until mid-October. That calculation is correct for the withdrawal and wrong for the swap.
Making matters worse, Binance continues to support withdrawal of the old token on Ethereum and Polygon. So the withdrawal still works smoothly after September 10, and at no point does the holder get any feedback that the decisive date has passed. They then hold a token on a chain whose trading liquidity has been pulled, and without the route through the portal.
We have seen a similar pattern at other venues, where several cut-offs run in sequence and the most prominent is not the most important. An overview of the deadlines currently running is in our roundup of exchange deadlines; the VANRY swap does not appear there, because it is not an exchange date but a project one.
Some processes cannot be hurried: start turning on the last day and you will not get through. Staked holdings follow their own mechanics, and they are the reason this piece cannot wait until September. Vanar's staking contract has a lock-up of 21 days. Initiate unstaking today and your tokens come back into free circulation a good three weeks from now.
The portal puts the condition like this: "Any wallet that does not initiate unstaking by September 10, 2026 will not be included in the Base airdrop." What counts, then, is the moment the process is started, not the moment it ends. Holders who begin unstaking before September 10 remain eligible on this account, even if the 21 days are still running on that date. They are then due to receive the migrated tokens by airdrop on Base on September 11, 2026.
The difference between starting and completing decides the entire holding here, so precision is worth the effort. The process is started with the transaction that begins the cooldown. It is completed when the tokens are freely movable again after the 21 days have elapsed. For eligibility, the portal says the first is what counts; for a manual swap through the portal you would need the second, and there is only enough time for that if you start by August 20 at the latest.
The project also writes that it can neither unstake nor withdraw tokens on behalf of users. This action therefore rests entirely with the holder. A wallet nobody opens will not be moved from outside.
The portal describes the process in four steps and requires neither a bridge nor a manual claim. The holder connects their wallet, picks the chain their VANRY sits on, enters the amount and confirms an approval as well as the lock transaction itself. The new VANRY are then delivered on Base to the same wallet address, usually within around four hours according to the portal.
Ethereum, VanarChain and Polygon are supported as source chains, and the destination chain is Base and nothing else. Anyone holding VANRY on more than one of these chains can migrate them one after another; the portal notes explicitly that each chain is handled separately.
One property of this process deserves attention, because it cannot be undone: once the lock transaction is confirmed, the old tokens cannot be retrieved from the portal. The project writes that locked VANRY cannot be withdrawn. Get the address or the chain wrong and there is no second chance within the same operation. The approval and the lock transaction therefore belong in a calm moment, not in the final hour of the window.
For holders whose balance sits on a centralised exchange, everything depends on whether that venue handles the migration itself. The portal maintains a list for this with links to the respective announcements. When we retrieved it on August 17, 2026, six venues were on it: Paribu, Bitvavo, LBank, Indodax, BingX and WEEX.
Of those, Bitvavo matters most to German-speaking readers, because that provider serves German customers directly. Anyone holding VANRY there will find the authoritative information in the venue's own announcement and should read it before moving anything.
What is missing from this list is worth noting. English-language coverage on August 10 reported that KuCoin would handle the migration automatically. KuCoin was not on the project's official list on August 17. We have not been able to resolve that discrepancy and therefore present it for what it is: a media statement without a counterpart in the project's own listing. Rely only on an announcement from your own venue.
The portal itself states the general rule with restraint: each exchange communicates its own approach, some handle the migration directly, others require users to withdraw and swap themselves. There is therefore no blanket statement covering all venues.
One warning appears in the portal in particularly plain terms, and it is aimed at exactly the holder who wants to save time: tokens must not be sent into the swap directly from an exchange. The route runs through your own wallet first.
The reason lies in the delivery. The new VANRY go to the same address on Base from which the old ones were locked. A deposit address at an exchange, however, belongs to the exchange and not to the user, and on Base it is not necessarily the same one or present at all. Lock from inside an exchange account and you are naming a destination you have no access to.
In practice that means a wallet of your own that can represent Base, and the certainty that you can access that wallet on Base as well. Which type of custody comes into question and where the differences lie is set out in our comparison of software wallets. The project adds that it never asks for a private key and that links from comments, direct messages or forwarded screenshots should not be used. With migrations on a fixed deadline that is no boilerplate, because time pressure is exactly the condition in which fake portals work.
The project publishes the contract addresses in the portal. On Ethereum and Polygon the old VANRY carries the same address, namely 0x8de5b80a0c1b02fe4976851d030b36122dbb8624. On VanarChain, VANRY was the network currency and therefore has no token contract. The new VANRY on Base sits at 0x07848a7b542a9cd856122c6c4ab9ec87c44f8b63.
These details are not decoration. After a migration with a fixed deadline, copycat tokens carrying the same name and the same ticker appear as a matter of routine. The contract is the one feature that cannot be faked, and it belongs checked in your own wallet before the first trade.
The old contract technically remains in place but no longer leads anywhere. The swap is one for one; the supply structures of the two tokens are not. We retrieved the public data records for both contracts ourselves on August 17, 2026 at around 03:53 UTC, each with HTTP code 200. This analysis was carried out by cryptoticker.io on August 17, 2026.
The record for the old token shows a total supply of 2,377,565,576 VANRY against a maximum supply of 2.4 billion. The record for the new token on Base gives a total and simultaneously maximum supply of 10,000,000,000 VANRY, of which 3,800,000,000 are in circulation. From those two figures it follows arithmetically that 6.2 billion tokens, and therefore 62 percent of the new maximum supply, are not yet in circulation.
For a holder whose balance does not change in the swap, that means a shift in share. Measured against the respective total supply, their share falls to around 23.8 percent of its previous value, so to roughly a quarter. This is a division, not a statement about price: what the market makes of it is not contained in these figures, and we derive neither an expectation nor a recommendation from them.
A further observation from the same retrieval concerns the state of the data. The entry for the old token is now carried by the data provider with the suffix "OLD", shows a circulating supply of zero and no market capitalisation. Six days after the window opened, the data providers are therefore already treating the old contract as superseded, while it continues to run on chain and remains transferable. A holder checking their balance against a price page may already be looking at the new token while the old one still sits in their wallet.
What we cannot derive from this retrieval: how many holders have already migrated, how the 3.8 billion tokens in circulation split between swapped balances and other allocations, and on what schedule the remaining 6.2 billion will be released. The portal gives no figure on this that we could have checked.
The project describes the state after September 10 with restraint and in part as still open. It is on record that the old contracts on Ethereum, Polygon and VanarChain no longer represent the active VANRY economy and are to be decommissioned once the window closes. Full contract details and any final measures are to be announced beforehand through the project's official channels.
Two technical points from the same FAQ belong here, because they are often confused. The old contracts contain a function that allows transfers to be halted at contract level. A function that would allow individual balances to be locked, frozen, clawed back or altered does not exist, according to the project. The team therefore cannot take an individual holder's balance away, but it can halt the contract as a whole.
In practice that means the old token does not vanish from your wallet on September 10. It loses its connection. Whether and when it can still be moved after that hangs on a decision the project has not yet taken.
The German tax authorities treat the exchange of one cryptocurrency for another as a disposal of one asset and an acquisition of the other. Within the one-year holding period under Section 23 of the German Income Tax Act, a gain from it is taxable above the annual exemption threshold of 1,000 euros.
Whether a migration of the same token onto a new contract at a one-to-one ratio falls under that principle is not thereby answered. We are not aware of an explicit statement from the tax authorities on this specific process, and we assert none here that does not exist. Both readings are conceivable: the process as a tax-neutral continuation of the same asset, or as an exchange with the usual consequences for the holding period and the acquisition date. The difference decides whether your holding period continues or starts afresh.
In practice that yields one recommendation which is right either way: record the process in full. That includes the date and time of the lock transaction, the amount, the source chain, the transaction hashes on both sides and the original acquisition date of the old tokens. Anyone having to piece those details together later may no longer find them if the old contract has been halted. The tax assessment itself belongs in the hands of a tax adviser.
Three things remain open, and they stand here rather than disappearing into a footnote.
First, we did not trigger a swap ourselves. All details of the process come from the project's own description, not from an attempt of our own. Whether delivery actually happens within the four hours stated is therefore something we cannot confirm.
Second, the Binance announcement is blocked to automated requests; the page answered us with a rejection message rather than content. A reader reaches it normally in a browser. We confirmed its content through search results from several mutually independent trade publications and link to it in the usual way.
Third, for the venues outside the official list we obtained no confirmation of our own. Which exchange handles the migration can also change at short notice; the list in the portal is a snapshot from August 17, 2026.
(As of August 17, 2026. This article is not investment advice. Prices and fee structures change; check the terms with the provider before you buy.)
