Even though we sometimes look at the downsides, we should consider their possible upsides. Let’s explore the main points from Delphi Digital’s report about airdrops.
At first, airdrops were simple. Projects like Uniswap gave all users the same number of tokens. As time passed, people came up with better ways to do things. Take Jito, for example. They used different levels for their airdrops. Optimism set up many rules you had to follow to get in on their airdrop.
Point systems are all the rage these days. They were to distribute tokens to real users and prevent Sybil attacks. What’s a Sybil attack? It is when someone registers many fake identities to get many tokens. Here are some recent examples:
Even with these new ideas, a big problem still exists: the bubble effect. This happens when a project sees a surge in activity before an airdrop snapshot (when a project takes user data for distribution) and then drops afterward.
LayerZero and its Stargate Finance project prove this pattern. Stargate’s bridging volume hit $1.67 billion before their airdrop. After the snapshot, it tumbled 75% to $406.7 million. zkSync also saw its daily fees sink under $10,000 for the first time following its airdrop. This pattern repeats itself; Kamino Finance, Parcl, Manta Network, and Jito Sol declined after their airdrops.
One primary issue with airdrops is differentiating fake from genuine users. If users see your products as valuable, they’ll get stuck on your product and become returning clients. Now, that’s natural growth. But fake growth is typical after distributing airdrop rewards. People rush to a project and abandon it after they get their airdrop allocation; this is short-lived growth.
To get a hold on a project’s performance, Delphi Digitals has some basic rules for you:
That’s how you can tell if a project or protocol is still valuable after its airdrop reward allocation.
The second challenge is the ‘low float/high diluted valuation (FDV)’ token model in 2024. This strategy keeps the token circulation small while the perceived total value is significant. While this can give the impression of value in a project, it leads to new investors needing clarification and consistency in the project evaluation when the pressure of selling created by airdrops occurs.
Airdrops may attract new users, but the critical question is whether they stay. Airdrops are like social media giveaways; they bring people to your page, but only some become genuine followers. Investors must distinguish between temporary hype and organic growth.
Airdrops can help, but they also pose significant risks and problems. Projects must plan their airdrop tactics to encourage genuine interest and avoid fake activity spikes. So, while airdrops benefit users, it’s sometimes a different story for projects.
The information discussed by Altcoin Buzz is not financial advice. This is for educational, entertainment, and informational purposes only. Any information or strategies are thoughts and opinions relevant to the accepted risk tolerance levels of the writer/reviewers and their risk tolerance may be different than yours. We are not responsible for any losses you may incur due to any investments directly or indirectly related to the information provided. Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are high-risk investments so please do your due diligence. Copyright Altcoin Buzz Pte Ltd.
The post Delphi Digital Report: Do Airdrops Help or Harm? appeared first on Altcoin Buzz.