US Housing Department Eyes Blockchain & Crypto—What It Means for Real Estate

• The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is exploring blockchain for grant tracking and considering stablecoin payments.
• The proposal has sparked debate, with concerns over volatility and potential risks to federal funding programs.

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is investigating the use of blockchain technology and stablecoins in its financial affairs.

Internal discussions have focused on the use of blockchain to monitor the distribution of grants, with officials stating it may be used as a pilot for broader use of cryptocurrency by federal agencies.

Sources indicate that HUD officials met last month to discuss how blockchain might be incorporated into the agency’s financial processes. The agency handles significant funding, including grants worth billions of dollars as well as mortgage insurance worth over a trillion dollars.

Some officials view blockchain as a tool for greater federal transparency in spending, while others remain skeptical, questioning whether digital assets can be of real utility without imposing undue complexity and risk.

In the wake of the negotiations, though, the department has concerns that incorporating blockchain will expose federal housing funds to instability.

HUD Employees Suspect Political Influence in Blockchain Talks

The blockchain adoption talks have been received with mixed views. Some HUD officials say stablecoin integration may revolutionize the financial transaction process, making it more efficient.

Others worry that such a move will be similar to past financial crises in attracting unregulated assets into a central sector. A staffer likened the plan to past financial missteps, questioning whether it will really make HUD’s grants more effective in awarding them.

Global consulting giant EY has been leading the debate, with one of its officials attending the most significant sessions. The company previously advocated for the application of blockchain in money tracking, arguing it can be used to raise transparency levels and reduce the possibility of error in government spending.

However, critics say blockchain technology still needs to prove its utility in such applications, and its use in HUD operations can be redundant and cumbersome.

Adding to the uncertainty are suspicions among HUD employees that outside political and business interests are driving the program.

The Trump administration was pro-cryptocurrency, with the discussion of a “strategic Bitcoin reserve” fueling speculation about the government’s increasing interaction with digital assets.

Concerns Over Blockchain Implementation in Federal Housing

The main area of contention is whether blockchain is a necessary extension of HUD’s current financial tracking mechanism. Officials argue that the current approaches already ensure accountability, and the addition of blockchain will only add layers of complexity.

HUD issued a memo labeling the idea inefficient and risky, warning it could destabilize grants by funding them with cryptocurrency.

Despite such concerns, some of the meeting participants saw the possibility of blockchain reducing fraud while enabling real-time reporting of how grants are spent.

They believed that if other federal agencies are converging towards stablecoin-based payments, HUD might be compelled to shift to be in sync with overall government fiscal policies.

However, there were officials who questioned the motives behind the proposal, with one of them stating it was being proposed merely in response to outside pressure rather than any demonstrated necessity.

Others said any such movement towards blockchain-based tracking of grants would be at the discretion of the U.S. Treasury and might be impractical for HUD’s mission.

Future of Crypto in Government Housing Programs

Various government agencies have previously been interested in blockchain technology, though its use in federal housing initiatives remains uncertain.

The Departments of the Treasury and Commerce have examined blockchain applications in the past, though no widespread adoption has occurred.

Some argue that it is too risky to require government agencies to use blockchain, especially when vulnerable populations depend on HUD funding.

Experts warn that the integration of stablecoins in housing programs can produce unintended issues. A recent instance in which a stablecoin plummeted by 13% demonstrates the fiscal uncertainty such assets can cause for federal funding programs.

Nevertheless, if the government-backed funds for housing were tied to cryptocurrency, the slightest changes could have a significant impact.

The post US Housing Department Eyes Blockchain & Crypto—What It Means for Real Estate appeared first on ETHNews.