Very Network Launch coverage keeps returning to one specific number: 1,000 VERY, the price of a VeryPunks NFT during its public mint. Prior coverage flagged this as the first confirmed token-
Very Network Launch coverage keeps returning to one specific number: 1,000 VERY, the price of a VeryPunks NFT during its public mint. Prior coverage flagged this as the first confirmed token-spending requirement found in this series.
This update takes that further and actually tests whether it qualifies as real, sustained token utility, or just a one-time event dressed up as one.
Per officialVery Network updates, VeryPunks' public mint phase runs October 6 through October 13, priced at 1,000 VERY per NFT, capped at 2 per account, and payable only from a wallet's VERY balance, explicitly excluding the in-app mining balance.
The same announcement states plainly that these NFTs are "Pure PFP. No utility, no extra benefits now or later." Both facts are confirmed and worth holding together: real VERY must be spent to participate, but the thing being purchased carries no further function once minted.
Beforescoring VeryPunks against it, it's worth being explicit about what separates genuine, sustained token utility from a one-off demand event. Four questions are useful:
Does it recur? A mechanism that requires ongoing token spend, not a single transaction.
Does it scale with growth? Demand that increases as the user base grows, rather than being capped at a fixed quantity.
Does it tie to core platform function? Utility-embedded in something users need repeatedly, not an optional side feature.
Does it create a lasting constraint on supply or behavior? An effect that outlasts the specific event itself.
Test
Does VeryPunks Meet It?
Why
Recurs over time
No
Two fixed mint windows (free and public), each with defined start and end dates; no stated repeat mechanism
Scales with growth
No
Capped at 10,000 total NFTs regardless of how large VERY's user base becomes
Ties to core platform function
No
Explicitly described as a standalone collectible with "no-utility, no extra benefits"
Creates a lasting constraint
Partially
VERY spent on the mint is genuinely removed from active circulation, but only for the fixed supply minted, not an ongoing effect
VeryPunks passes none of the first three tests and only partially satisfies the fourth. That doesn't make it fake or unimportant; it's a real, on-chain-verifiable token sink, but it fails the bar for what would count as sustained token-utility.
One-Time Sink Vs Recurring Utility: Why Difference Matters For Pre-Listing Token
For a token that has not been listed anywhere yet, the distinction isn't academic. Recurring-utility, something users need to keep spending VERY on, builds an ongoing case for demand that could support price once trading begins.
A one-time sink, however genuine, spends itself out: once the 10,000 VeryPunks are minted and the windows close, this specific mechanism stops generating any further VERY demand.
EvaluatingVERY's long-term utility case requires looking at what happens after October 13, not just at the mint itself.
Worth keeping explicitly separate from today's analysis. VeryChat, Node rewards, and VeryAds represent an ongoing, different utility question, covered elsewhere in this series, with its own separate unresolved issue: whether VeryAds specifically requires direct VERY spend or merely funds token distribution.
Today's VeryPunks analysis doesn't change or resolve that separate question, and shouldn't be read as commentary on it either way.
Also worth stating plainly. VERY remains unlisted onany CEX or DEX in the sources reviewed.
The VeryPunks mint, real utility-test result notwithstanding, is an ecosystem-level event that doesn't advance or confirm anything about exchange-listing status, which remains a separate, unresolved track in this coverage.
The VeryPunks mint doesn't establish a market price, since VERY still isn't trading anywhere.Very Network Price Prediction Figures remain the same speculative, comparable-token bands used throughout this coverage.
Scenario
Speculative Price Range
Implied FDV (at 10B supply)
Basis
Bear Case
$0.001–$0.01
$10M–$100M
Comparable tokens where confirmed-utility stayed limited to one-time events without recurring mechanisms
Base Case
$0.01–$0.05
$100M–$500M
Comparable tokens with a mix of one-time sinks and modest recurring utility
Bull Case
$0.05–$0.15
$500M–$1.5B
Comparable tokens where token-spending mechanisms expanded into genuinely recurring, core-platform utility
Condition
Why It Matters
Confirmed In Sources Reviewed?
A follow-up collection or recurring minting mechanism using VERY
Would convert a one-time event into an ongoing token sink
Not confirmed
VERY required for a core, repeatable platform function (not a collectible)
Would tie token spend to regular usage rather than a single purchase
Not confirmed
Demand for VeryPunks itself creating secondary-market VERY-denominated activity
Would extend VERY's role beyond the initial mint transaction
Not confirmed
Informational purposes only, not financial advice. VeryPunks' 1,000 VERY public mint price is a confirmed, fixed in-app cost tied to a one-time, 10,000-piece collection, not evidence of recurring token utility. VERY remains unlisted on any CEX or DEX. VeryChat's broader ecosystem utility is a separate question not addressed by this analysis. Price figures are speculative estimates unchanged from prior coverage, not an official Very Network forecast. Cryptocurrency carries significant risk of loss.
