UTED
ETF
BTC
WHEN
4
The bitcoin market is changing dimension. Indeed, BlackRock’s ETF has just surpassed a historic player in crypto derivatives, marking a turning point in the sector’s organization. This surpassing is not just a simple record, but reflects a rapid advancement of regulated markets compared to offshore platforms. This evolution redefines the balances and confirms bitcoin’s anchoring in traditional finance.
The bitcoin derivatives market crossed a symbolic threshold on Friday, when options linked to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) ETF surpassed those of Deribit, an historic player in the sector. The open interest of IBIT options listed on Nasdaq reached 27.61 billion dollars, compared to Deribit’s bitcoin options totaling 26.90 billion dollars.
This shift attracts attention due to its speed. BlackRock’s ETF has closed the gap in only two years with a platform operating since 2016. This progress reflects a profound change in access to crypto derivative products, now more anchored in regulated infrastructures.
This evolution can be partly explained by the opening of the American market to a new category of investors. Options, which allow buying or selling an asset at a predetermined price, play a central role in hedging and speculation strategies.
The open interest, a reference indicator for measuring market size and liquidity, here reflects a rise in flows on products accessible through traditional brokers. Sidrah Fariq, a Deribit executive, highlights this point: “U.S. retail investors cannot access platforms like Deribit, so options on the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) offer them direct access to leverage and options exposure in a regulated framework.”
Here are some key points :
Beyond this record, position analysis reveals marked differences in investor expectations. Data shows that IBIT options include more optimistic scenarios, with a concentration of positions suggesting bitcoin near 109,709 dollars, approximately 41% above current levels.
Conversely, positions observed on Deribit anticipate a more moderate rise around 106,000 dollars. This divergence reflects distinct investor profiles. According to Volmex, “call options open interest on regulated markets is positioned about 4 percentage points further out-of-the-money than on offshore platforms,” reflecting a stronger exposure to bullish scenarios on regulated markets.
Behaviors also differ regarding investment horizons. IBIT options favor longer maturities, notably around October 2026, while Deribit positions focus more on shorter maturities, such as August.
This structure suggests a more patient approach from investors via the ETF, against a more tactical management on crypto platforms. Volmex points out that “IBIT options have maturities on average about two months longer, weighted by open interest,” which reflects the nature of underlying portfolios.
Moreover, the higher implied volatility on IBIT is explained by increased demand for protection through put options, as ETF holders cannot easily adopt direct short positions.
This evolution outlines a two-speed market, where regulated and offshore infrastructures coexist without replacing each other. Sidrah Fariq insists on this complementarity: “I do not see this as competition. On the contrary, it broadens the market.”
As institutional investors appropriate these tools, the depth and sophistication of the bitcoin market could increase, favoring better price formation. This trajectory indicates a gradual integration of bitcoin into global finance standards, with lasting implications on its volatility, accessibility, and role in global portfolios.